Ethics
Advisory Opinion No. 25
June
14, 1999
Issued
By: City Attorney’s Office
Whether a City employee may advertise as a Realtor in the City Beat.
A City employee has asked whether he may
advertise as a realtor in the "City Beat." The following facts
are presented:
Thomas Bailey is an employee in the City
Attorney’s Office. In his position as an Assistant City Attorney, his
responsibilities include, but are not limited to, preparing leases and license
agreements and providing legal advice to various City departments.
Mr. Bailey is also a realtor in the
The issue is whether Mr. Bailey may
advertise as a realtor in City Beat given his position with the City.
Under the Ethics Code of the City of
Improper Economic Benefit. As a general rule, a City employee may not take any
official action that he knows is likely to have an effect on, among others, his
economic interest that is distinguishable from the effect on the public in
general. Should such occur, the City employee is required to recuse himself
immediately, refraining from any further participation in the matter, and
disclose in writing to the City Clerk the economic benefit. In the
instant case, advertising in the City’s monthly publication does not
present an improper economic benefit for Mr. Bailey. Because it is open to all
City employees as well as local businesses, and because Mr. Bailey, in so
advertising, is not taking official action, there is no violation of this
section of the Ethics Code.
Unfair Advancement of Private Interests. Part B. Section 2[1]
of the Code prohibits all City employees from using their position "to
unfairly advance or impede private interests, or to grant or secure, or attempt
to grant or secure, for any person (including himself [ ]) any form of special
consideration, treatment, exemption, or advantage beyond that which is lawfully
available to other persons." As stated in the previous paragraph,
advertising in said publication is open to everyone. Therefore, should Mr.
Bailey advertise in this publication, there would be no violation of unfairly
advancing his interests. Mr. Bailey however, would be prohibited from
identifying himself as a City employee in the publication. Such an
identification, may give Mr. Bailey an advantage over other Realtors who may
want to advertise in the publication.
SUMMARY
City employees are governed by the standards
of conduct as set forth in the Ethics Code of the City of
FRANK J. GARZA
City Attorney