
Ethics Advisory Opinion No. 98
Issued By: City Attorney’s Office
I. Issues:
May a city official accept a gift worth more than $100 from a personal friend?
If so, is the official required to report the receipt of the gift?
II. Inquiry
A city official has inquired whether he may accept a gift valued at more than $100 from a personal friend. The friend has no business relationship with the city and is not associated with any entity that has or is seeking a business relationship with the city. If he may accept the gift, the official also asks whether he is required to include the gift in his annual financial disclosure report.
III. The Ethics Code
A. Receipt
of Gifts or Benefits
The Ethics Code includes two rules which
regulate the acceptance of gifts by city employees. The first restricts gifts given with the
intent to influence or reward a city official or employee for official
action. This rule states:
A city official or
employee shall not solicit, accept, or agree to accept any gift or benefit for
himself or herself or his or her business:
(A) that reasonably
tends to influence or reward official conduct; or
(B) that the official or employee knows or should
know is being offered with the intent to influence or reward official conduct.
Ethics Code, Section 2-45(a)(1).
The second rule restricts gifts from
specific sources, regardless of the motivation for the gift:
A city official or
employee shall not solicit, accept, or agree to accept any gift or benefit,
from:
(A)
any individual or business entity doing or seeking to do business with the
City; or
(B) any
registered lobbyist or public relations firm; or
(C) any
person seeking action or advocating on zoning or platting matters before a city
body,
save and except for
i) items received that are of nominal value; or
ii) meals in an individual expense of $50 or
less at any occurrence and no more than a cumulative value of $500 in a single
calendar year from a single source.
Ethics Code, Section 2-45(a)(2). There are some exceptions for gifts from
these restricted sources, including the admission to events attended in
connection with the official or employee’s city responsibilities. See Ethics Code, Section 2-45(b) for
complete list of exceptions.
In this inquiry, the official’s friend is not a
“restricted” donor under Section 2-45(a)(2), i.e. he is not doing or seeking to
do business with the city, a registered lobbyist or a person seeking zoning or
platting action. Accordingly, the
restrictions under Section 2-45(a)(2) do not apply. Further, there is nothing to indicate the
gift is being offered to influence or reward the official for official
action. Therefore, Section 2-45(a)(1) is
not implicated, either.
The two ethics code provisions regarding the acceptance of
gifts do not prohibit or limit the official from receiving a gift from
his personal friend. The next issue,
though, is whether the official must report the gift.
B. Reporting Gifts and Benefits
As noted, the Ethics Code regulates the receipt of gifts
from certain sources and whether the benefit must be reported. These are separate requirements. A city employee may be authorized to receive
a gift, but may or may not be required to disclose it.
There are two disclosure provisions. First, all officials, including board
members, and executive-level staff are required to submit a full annual
financial disclosure report. Ethics
Code, Section 2-73. Some other
designated staff members, the “specified employees,” are required to submit a
one-page annual gift report. Ethics
Code, Section 2-78. The remaining
employees are not subject to financial disclosure requirements. For individuals who file financial
disclosure or gift reports, they must report the receipt of gifts with more
than $100, regardless of their source.
There are exceptions, though, for the types of gifts or
benefits that must be included in the report:
(1)
lawful campaign contributions which are reported as required by state
statute or local ordinance;
(2)
gifts received from family members within the second degree of affinity
or consanguinity;
(3) gifts from an individual based on personal
friendship who during the preceding three calendar years: a) has
not done or sought to do business with the city; b) has not sought city action on any issue
before the City Council or any city board or commission; c) is
not associated with any business or entity that has done or sought to do
business with the city; and d) is not associated with any business or entity
that has sought city action on any issue before the City Council or a city
board or commission;
4) gifts received among and between fellow city
employees and city officials;
5) admission to events in which the reporting
party participated in connection official duties; and
6) payment of or reimbursement of travel and accommodation
expenses accepted in connection with official duties which have been reported
[on a travel report];
Ethics Code, Sections 2-74(n) and 2-78. Under these exceptions, the employee will
not be required to report the gift from his friend because the gift is based on
personal friendship and the friend has not during the preceding three years
sought business or action from the city, nor has the friend been associated
with any business or entity that has sought business or action from the
city. The official will not be
required to report the gift from his friend on his annual financial disclosure
report.
It should be noted, though, that there are state reporting
requirements for the city’s elected officials, city manager and city
attorney. Under Chapter 572 of the
Local Government Code, these officials must submit a Personal Financial
Statement in which they are required to disclose any gift worth more than $250
given to themselves, their spouses or dependent children. The only exceptions to this requirement are
gifts given by lobbyists who are required to report their expenditures or gifts
from family members related within the second degree.
IV. Conclusion
Under the circumstances of this inquiry, the employee may
accept the gift from the personal friend regardless of the value of the
gift. The official is not required to
report the gift under the reporting requirements of the city’s Ethics Code. He may be required to report the gift under
the state requirements set out in Chapter 572 of the Local Government Code.