
Ethics Advisory Opinion No.
13
September 1, 2004
Issued By: The Ethics Review Board
Whether the phrase "termination of his or her
official duties" as used in Part C Section 2(b) of the City of San Antonio's
Ethics Code means the last day any "official duty" was performed or
the last day of employment.
The
Ethics Board has been asked to determine whether the two year prohibition on
representation before the City began on the last day “official duties” were
performed or the date of the requestor’s termination as a city employee.
The
requestor states that he terminated all "official duties" with the
City Attorney's Office on August 9, 2002. However to accommodate budget
concerns of the department, he was carried on the records of the City as an
“employee” through October of that year, until his accumulated vacation leave
was used up. The individual states that he performed no job duties for the City
subsequent to August 9, 2002.
The Ethics Code in Part A, Section 2, Definitions, states
that: “Except as provided in Section 10 of Part B (Prohibited Interests in
Contracts), Section 4(c) of Part C (Discretionary Contracts), and Part G
(Financial Disclosure), the term “employee” or “city employee” is any person
listed on the City of San Antonio payroll as an employee, whether part-time or
full-time. A “former city official” or “former city employee” is a person whose
city duties terminated on or after the effective date of this code.”
The requestor is a person who, prior to termination of
employee status, was listed on the City of San Antonio payroll as an employee,
and whose City duties terminated after the effective date of the Code, January
1, 1999. His date of official termination as an employee was October 30, 2002.
He therefore falls under the jurisdiction of the Code as a former city
employee.
Part C of the Code lists the standards of conduct to which a
former city official or employee must abide. There are three (3) standards of
conduct that apply to former city officials or employees in the provisions of
Part C. Those standards of conduct concern: (1) continuing confidentiality; (2)
subsequent representation; and (3) discretionary contracts.
The Ethics Code, Part C: Former City Officials and Employees,
Section 2, Subsequent Representation, subparagraph (b) Representation Before
the City states: “A former city official or employee shall not represent for
compensation any person, group, or entity, other than himself or herself, or
his or her spouse or minor children, before the city for a period of two (2)
years after termination of his or her official duties. This subsection does not
apply to a person who was classified as a city official only because he or she
was an appointed member of a board or other city body. For purposes of this
subsection, the term compensation means money or any other thing of value that
is received, or is to be received, in return for or in connection with such
representation.”
The
requestor believes that the Ethics Code’s two (2) year prohibition on
representation should end on August 9, 2004. The requestor states that if the
Code intended to prohibit an individual from any contact for a period of two
(2) years it would simply provide that no former employee could represent a
client before the City for two (2) years. He states that the rules of statutory
construction assume that words are chosen by the legislature for a reason and
have their standard meaning unless defined otherwise, and thus pursuant to such
rules, the phrase "official duties" means exactly what it says i.e.
the last day of any "official duty" and not the last day of
employment. He requests that the Ethics Review Board provide an advisory
opinion on this issue.
Based upon the usage of the terms
“city employee” as any person listed on the City of San Antonio payroll as an
employee, and “former city employee” as a person whose city duties terminated
on or after the effective date of the code as found in Part A, Section 2,
Definitions, of the Ethics Code; the Ethics Review Board believes that “termination
of official duties” equates to “termination of employment.” In this case, the
two year prohibition on
representation before the City will end on October 30, 2004.

|
___________________________ |
|
|
ARTHUR DOWNEY, District
9 Chair |
|
____________________________
MICHAEL ARIENS
Mayor Appointee
____________________________
CHARLES CODD
District 1
____________________________
DAVID DE LA GARZA
District 4
____________________________
STEVEN G. GENGENBACHER
District 3
____________________________
AUGUST STEPHEN JOHNSON
District 2
____________________________
ELIZABETH BENAVIDES MELSON
District 7
____________________________
LOREN WOOD
District 10
____________________________
BENJAMIN F. YOUNGBLOOD, III
District 8